{"id":4004,"date":"2020-03-15T01:03:29","date_gmt":"2020-03-14T22:03:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lekolin.org\/80-bin-secmen-aihm-yolunda\/"},"modified":"2020-03-15T01:03:29","modified_gmt":"2020-03-14T22:03:29","slug":"80-bin-secmen-aihm-yolunda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/80-bin-secmen-aihm-yolunda\/","title":{"rendered":"80 Bin Se\u00e7men AiHM Yolunda"},"content":{"rendered":"

08 Temmuz 2011 Cuma Saat 16:19<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n
\nAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 reddetmesi \u00fczerine konuyu A\u0130HM’e ta\u015f\u0131yacaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirten Hatip Dicle’nin avukatlar\u0131ndan Fethi G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f,<\/b><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\tAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 reddetmesi \u00fczerine konuyu A\u0130HM’e ta\u015f\u0131yacaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirten Hatip Dicle’nin avukatlar\u0131ndan Fethi G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, ‘Sadece biz de\u011fil Dicle\u2019ye oy veren 80 bin se\u00e7men de A\u0130HM’e gidecek’ dedi<\/p>\n

\u00bb ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 REDDETT\u0130<\/p>\n

YSK taraf\u0131ndan milletvekilli\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclen Hatip Dicle’nin avukatlar\u0131, 85. maddeye dayanarak son karar merci olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftu. Anayasa Mahkemesi avukatlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurusunu yetkisizlik gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetti. Dicle’nin avukat\u0131 Fethi G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fckendi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

\u00bb G\u00dcM\u00dc\u015e: A\u0130HM’E G\u0130DECE\u011e\u0130Z<\/p>\n

Hatip Dicle hakk\u0131nda verilen karar\u0131n bir konsept sonucunda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, “H\u00fck\u00fcmetten ba\u015flamak \u00fczere di\u011fer b\u00fct\u00fcn kurumlar da bu konuda hemfikirdir. Ortak bir konseptin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcd\u00fcr” dedi. G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, hak gasp\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in 80 bin se\u00e7menle A\u0130HM’e ba\u015fvuracaklar\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00a0Amed se\u00e7meni A\u0130HM yolunda<\/p>\n

YSK taraf\u0131ndan milletvekilli\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclen Hatip Dicle i\u00e7in son karar mercii Anayasa Mahkemesi de Amed’den 80 bine yak\u0131n oyla se\u00e7ilen Dicle’nin ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti. Hatip Dicle’nin avukatlar\u0131ndan Fethi G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, \u0130\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131 t\u00fckettikten sonra davay\u0131 uluslararas\u0131 arenaya ta\u015f\u0131yacaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, YSK’nin Hatip Dicle’nin adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u00f6nce onay verdi\u011fini ve se\u00e7menlerin de buna g\u00fcvenerek Dicle’ye oyunu verdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, ancak ayn\u0131 onay\u0131 veren YSK’nin milletvekilli\u011fini iptal ederek bir hukuksuzlu\u011fa imza att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n

A\u0130HM’e gidece\u011fiz<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin olumsuz karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan konuyu Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’ne ta\u015f\u0131yacaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, Hatip Dicle hakk\u0131nda verilen karar, bir konsept sonucunda \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olan bir karard\u0131r. H\u00fck\u00fcmetten ba\u015flamak \u00fczere di\u011fer b\u00fct\u00fcn kurumlar bu konuda hemfikirdir. B\u00f6yle olunca da farkl\u0131 bir kurumun bu konseptin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir karar vermesini biz beklemiyorduk. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan konuyu uluslararas\u0131 arenaya ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131z” diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

Se\u00e7men de A\u0130HM yolunda<\/p>\n

Dicle’ye oy veren se\u00e7menin YSK’ye ba\u015fvurdu\u011funu belirten G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015fvurular\u0131n h\u2030l\u2030 devam etti\u011fini dile getirdi. G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, “Halk, iradesiyle oynand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in buna tepkisiz de\u011fil ve hakk\u0131n\u0131 ar\u0131yor. Halk\u0131n iradesiyle se\u00e7ilen bir ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda verilecek karar\u0131n ancak TBMM’nin vermesi gerekir, ba\u015fka kurumlar\u0131n de\u011fil. Hukuken de mant\u0131ken de budur. YSK \u00f6nce adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 onayl\u0131yor ard\u0131ndan se\u00e7ilince de vekilli\u011fi iptal ediyor. Bu halk\u0131n iradesiyle oynamad\u0131r. Se\u00e7menler de hem i\u00e7 hukuk hem de uluslararas\u0131 hukuka ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyor. Biz avukatlar olarak halka her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuki deste\u011fi sunaca\u011f\u0131z” \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

Se\u00e7mene sayg\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k<\/p>\n

Hatip Dicle d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer tutuklular\u0131nda serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmamas\u0131 konusuna da de\u011finen G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, ” Mahkemenin verdi\u011fi karar insanlar\u0131 tahrikten ba\u015fka, soka\u011fa d\u00f6kmekten ba\u015fka bir i\u015fe yaramamaktad\u0131r. 5 milletvekilinin \u015fu ana kadar tahliye edilmemesi hem siyaseten, hem hukuken do\u011fru bir karar de\u011fildir. 70 bin 80 bin oy alm\u0131\u015f ki\u015filerin serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmamas\u0131 demek, ona oy veren ki\u015filerin iradesini zindana atman\u0131z demektir. Se\u00e7menlerin duygular\u0131na, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerine, iradelerine sayg\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131kt\u0131r” dedi.<\/p>\n

AYM de reddetti kriz derinle\u015fiyor<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi, Dicle’nin avukatlar\u0131ndan Levent Kanat’\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 “karar iptali” ba\u015fvurusunu de\u011ferlendirdi. Mahkeme heyeti ba\u015fvuruyu “Anayasa’n\u0131n 79. maddesi gere\u011fince yetkisizlikten” reddetti. Kararla ilgili yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klama \u015f\u00f6yle: “1- 12.06.2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan XXIV. D\u00f6nem Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7imlerinde Diyarbak\u0131r ili se\u00e7im \u00e7evresinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z milletvekili se\u00e7ilen ve buna dair mazbatas\u0131n\u0131 alan m\u00fcvekkil Dicle hakk\u0131nda YSK’ce al\u0131nan 1022 no’lu ve 21.06.2011 tarihli kararda m\u00fcvekkile verilen milletvekili tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7ilme yeterli\u011fine ili\u015fkin tam kanunsuzluk hali nedeniyle iptaline dair karar\u0131 ile bu karara yap\u0131lan itiraz sonras\u0131nda verilen 1071 no’lu ve 23.06.2011 tarihli kararlar\u0131n iptaline, 2- Milletvekili aday listelerinin kesinle\u015fmesi sonras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan se\u00e7im sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re hakk\u0131nda milletvekili tutana\u011f\u0131 (mazbata) d\u00fczenlenen \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n milletvekili yeterlilik durumlar\u0131na dair karar verme yetkisinin TBMM’de oldu\u011funun tespitine, 3- YSK’n\u0131n itiraza konu karar\u0131 gere\u011fince \u0130l Se\u00e7im Kurulu’nca 2839 say\u0131l\u0131 Milletvekili Se\u00e7imi Kanunu’nun 34. ve 35. maddelerindeki esaslara g\u00f6re s\u0131radaki aday\u0131n tespit edilerek milletvekili tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmesine dair karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda Adalet ve Kalk\u0131nma Partisi’nin 6. s\u0131radaki aday\u0131 Oya Eronat’a milletvekili tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesine dair karar\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ve y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn durdurulmas\u0131na, karar verilmesi istemini i\u00e7eren, 27.6.2011 g\u00fcnl\u00fc dilek\u00e7esi ve ekleri, konuya ili\u015fkin rapor, ilgili Anayasa ve yasa kurallar\u0131 incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc ba\u015fvurunun, 2709 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131’n\u0131n 79. maddesi gere\u011fince yetkisizlikten reddine.”-\u00d6zg\u00fcr G\u00fcndem<\/p>\n

Taylan Esmer \/ AMED<\/p>\n

K\u00fcrdistan Stratejik Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar Merkezi<\/p>\n

www.navendalekolin.com – www.lekolin.org – www.lekolin.net \u2013 www.lekolin.info\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n

\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 reddetmesi \u00fczerine konuyu A\u0130HM’e ta\u015f\u0131yacaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirten Hatip Dicle’nin avukatlar\u0131ndan Fethi G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f,<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4005,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"jnews_post_split":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[32,31,36,33,30,35,34],"class_list":["post-4004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-basindan-secmeler","tag-arastirma","tag-kurdi","tag-kurdish","tag-kurdistan","tag-lekolin","tag-turkish","tag-turkiye"],"acf":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4004"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lekolin.org\/ku\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}